The endoscope challenge
Learn why multi-enzymatic detergents deliver enhanced, targeted cleaning power on endoscope organic films.
New study shows multi-enzymatic detergents deliver premium performance
Enhanced, targeted cleaning power on endoscope organic films
Healthcare acquired infections (HAIs) and their consequences have enormous impact on patients and hospitals, which makes effective cleaning of surgical instruments critical for safety. Now, a new study has shown the effectiveness of multi-enzymatic detergents – a proven technology in medical device reprocessing – on complex soils and organic films.
The study, finished in July 2021, by leading research institute Montana State University (Bozeman)*, evaluated a medical detergent with and without enzymes to assess the effectiveness of using different enzymes on breaking down complex soils and the ease of flushing soil. It was designed to replicate the biggest challenge in medical cleaning – removing organic films from an endoscope – and was carried out on relevant medical soils.
Although the results of the study indicate that a multi-enzyme approach delivers the best results, organic films are complex biological systems and more studies are needed to better understand the enzymes’ role in cleaning outcomes and to confirm the study’s findings.
In the US alone, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimate the overall annual direct financial costs of HAIs to hospitals at between $28bn and $45bn, and the cost in lives at around 72,000 per year. HAIs can lead to longer hospital stays, long-term disability and increased costs for patients, their families and healthcare providers.
Clinical soils – a complex cleaning challenge
Before we look at the study itself, it’s important to understand why cleaning clinical soils on medical instruments and devices is so challenging. There are two main reasons for this. Firstly, these soils are often embedded on surfaces that are difficult to access, such as into hinges, joints, lumens and other hard-to-reach parts of reusable medical devices.
Secondly, in addition to their location, each soil has a unique composition making it challenging to find a detergent that can break down the diverse types of organic soils. This is why many Sterile Processing Departments turn to enzymes.
Enzymatic detergents are designed to specifically target common clinical soils. For example, proteases work on proteins, like blood and muscle tissues; cellulases, amylases and mannanases break down common carbohydrates; while lipases target fatty soils like adipose tissue. Faced with complex soils, many reprocessing departments may use a blend of enzymes in the detergent to enhance cleaning performance.
Next generation enzymes
In recent years, the use of multi-enzyme detergents has grown as hospitals experience better results on more complex soils. With the arrival of new innovative enzymes such as Novozymes Everis™ Next and Everis™ Guard that focus on extracellular DNA and a previously untargeted organic polymer, respectively, enzymatic detergents can take another leap forward by actively targeting endoscope soils. Both enzymes are compatible with other enzymes and were included in the study.
It is proven that enzymatic detergents can enhance cleaning and patient safety in multiple healthcare applications, from manual soaking to automatic washing in a hospital’s sterile processing department.
Designed to replicate real conditions and study action on real soils
The study replicated endoscope cleaning challenges by testing different detergents’ ability to clean organic soils left by two pathogens that can cause HAIs - Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Both organisms are common isolates found in dirty medical instruments. By using real soils, the experiments came closer to real-life conditions faced by hospital sterile processing departments.
The detergent base chosen was a premium North American medical detergent with heavy surfactant load. The detergents were diluted to 0.78% prior to use. Treatments incubated for 20 minutes at 45oC under static conditions. As the mechanical action of the washing process is an important part of the actual cleaning process, it would be fair to assume better results in real-life conditions.
Enzymes tested
Method of analysis
Fluorescent staining techniques in combination with confocal microscopy were used to measure the reduction of DNA and carbohydrate soil on a Teflon surface, following treatment with different detergents. Each experiment was run three times on each of the organisms in tubing segments using a detergent with six different combinations of enzymes, as well as the same detergent without enzymes.
In addition to fluorescent staining, direct microbial counts (performed after a disinfecting treatment) were carried out on residual waste flushed from the tubing after treatment and on the residue remaining in the tubing using epifluorescent microscopy. The objective of the direct count method was to determine if the chemically-killed cells, replicating a device that had been previously disinfected, were easily cleaned from the surface due to enzymatic reduction of sticky-glue like organic residues or if they remained adhered to the inside surface of the tubing.
Findings
Reduction of DNA and carbohydrates soils
The average percent fluorescence reduction was calculated for the three experimental runs per species. When compared to the detergent without enzymes detergents C, E and G, all of which contained Everis™ Next, demonstrated the greatest average percent reductions in the DNA soil.
With respect to the carbohydrate soil, the same three detergents were again top performers against the residual soil left by one of the strains but not the other. Results demonstrate that combining Everis™ Prime, Everis™ Next, Everis™ Guard and other classes of enzymes can improve cleaning. Interestingly, the detergent with only a protease and the detergent with all of the enzymes except Everis™ Next and Everis™ Guard did not perform as well when compared to the detergent control.
Representative combined color images (figure 1) from the confocal microscopy show visual comparisons between the untreated control and the detergent only control to the enzymatic detergents C, E and G. Both controls show a stronger green fluorescence signal indicating the presence of more extracellular DNA and DNA found within non-viable cells. On the other hand, a reduced signal of green fluorescence attributed in part to the enzymatic degradation of DNA by Everis™ Next is observed in those samples treated with enzymatic detergents. While there is some red fluorescence observed in the images indicating the presence of carbohydrates it is not as noticeable and less telling of the enzymatic effects.
Figure 1: Representative fluorescent images from confocal microscopy showing the reduction of DNA-based soil (green fluorescence) with various enzymatic treatments as compared to and untreated and detergent only control.
Control (a), detergent control (b), detergent C (c), detergent E (d) and detergent G (e)
Additional combined color images (figure 2) further demonstrate the effects of Everis™ Next as well as carbohydrases including Everis™ Guard. The untreated control shows a high green fluorescence signal (representing DNA) and a few indications of red fluorescence (representing carbohydrates). And while the detergent only treatment is able to clean/reduce some of soil, when both controls are compared to enzymatic detergents C, D and E there is a stark difference in red and green fluorescence signals further indicating the cleaning effect of multi-enzymatic solutions.
Figure 2: Representative fluorescent images from confocal microscopy showing reduction of both DNA-based soil (green fluorescence) and carbohydrate soils (red fluorescence) with various enzymatic treatments compared to an untreated control and a detergent only control.
Control (a), detergent control (b), detergent C (c), detergent E (d) and detergent G (e)
Direct counts
While the direct count results were not as consistent with respect to the top performers as the fluorescence results, detergents E and G again demonstrated some of the best results. Treatment with these two detergents compared to the detergent only control showed more chemically-killed bacteria had been washed from the system leaving behind fewer chemically-killed bacteria in the tubing. Detergents D and F also performed well, and although Detergent C was not a top performer, it still performed better than the control detergent without enzymes. Once again, the detergent containing only a protease did not perform as well as the other enzymatics, further indicating that single enzyme solutions are not as effective as multi-enzymatic ones at cleaning complex organic soils. The results of the study demonstrated a reduction of some soils with enzymes, and positive trends in improving the ease of cleaning the teflon surface by loosening the glue-like properties of the organic residue. This was particularly clear in the experiments around sticky DNA soil where detergents C, E and G consistently stood out. All three detergents contain Everis™ Next, which is a newly released enzymatic innovation designed for complex medical soils.
Commenting on the study, Novozymes Senior Scientist John Howell says, “Adjusting some of these parameters may have further improved outcomes. For example, the study focused on the enzyme and detergent content and did not look at the effects of the age of the organic film, mechanical action (e.g., flushing while cleaning), temperature, dosing or time.”
Endoscope cleaning requires broad-spectrum enzymatic detergents
Getting an endoscope clean enough for subsequent effective high-level disinfection requires a broad-spectrum- approach – with the right enzyme content. Today’s average medical detergents typically use 1- 1.5 enzymes. To advance cleaning, especially with endoscopes, we must use more than two enzymes from different classes. The study also indicates that the advanced enzymes tested, Novozymes Everis™ Next and Everis™ Guard, can deliver robust performance in combination with other enzymes.
In recent years, the composition of detergents has changed with greater dosing of enzymes and a wider range of enzymes. This has given many sterile processing departments the cleaning performance they need. Now this study establishes a good baseline and proof of concept for the use of multienzymes in tackling complex soils in medical cleaning. However, more studies are required to further understand the role of enzymes in cleaning.
If you are interested in hearing more about this study or partnering for future studies, contact us below.
*This information was provided under a Montana State University Testing Services Agreement and is not intended to endorse or recommend any product or service.
To improve cleaning, more than two enzymes from different classes provide superior performance.